Assessment 3: Reflective Essay April 21, 2020 postadmin Post in Uncategorized 1Assessment 3: Reflective Essay 35%Weight: 35% (35 marks)Due Date: Friday 18 May 2018 at 5 pm via SafeAssign online submission point.ReflectionRaelin (2000) notes that a reflection is a potent vehicle for making sense of experience, improving ourpowers of observation, promoting consistency between beliefs and practices and spurring us to adoptnew practices. (Refer to Raelin, J. A. (2000), Work-based learning: the new frontier of managementdevelopment. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp.124-128).Team Developmental StagesTo become a team, a group of people go through a sequence of stages outlined by Tuckman (1965) asforming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Each stage has its own features and thiscreates difficulties for team members and their managers.The Task:Write a 1500 word essay (+/- 10%, excluding Reference List) reflecting on your interpersonal(between people) and intrapersonal (within the person) team communication experiences throughoutthe team developmental stages in the lead up to your Team Presentation. It is important to supportyour experiences with literature. Utilise a minimum of 6 peer-reviewed journal articles (post2007).Peer-reviewed or refereed articles are from academic/scholarly journals that only publish articles thathave passed through a review process. The review process helps ensure that the published articlesreflect solid scholarship in their fields. Internet and book references are optional but in addition to theforegoing requirement.Note: In reflective essays, it is appropriate to use the first person e.g.: ’I’, ‘my’, ‘our’, ‘he’, ‘she’ etc.Submission Format:The submission is to be done online by the due date according to the marking criteria.The Reflective Essay should be set out as follows:IntroductionThis section should contain:• A short explanation of your involvement in the team. What was your role?• Most importantly, clear and concise outline of what specifically will be discussed in youressay.• A short sentence on whether your experience is supported by the literatureWhen writing the introduction, try to be as specific as possible.Part 1In this section, you should:• Describe and analyse the interpersonal dynamics within your team2o For example, you can look at how any of the following issues affected your team inthis section:§ Diversity; listening and non-verbal communication; effectivecommunication issues; persuasion.• Describe and analyse the intrapersonal issues that affected the teamo For example, you can look at how any of the following issues affected the team inthis section:§ Self-awareness; self-disclosure and trust; goals, values and ethics; time andself-management.Note: You need to support all your reflections with research literature (only peer-reviewedjournal articles) on intra/interpersonal communication and working in teams.Make sure that you only write about your specific experience in your team. This sectionneeds to demonstrate your reflective capabilities of linking your team experience to the researchliterature.Part 2In this section, you should:• Describe and analyse the performance of your team throughout the team’s development.o For example, you can look at how your team managed any of the following issues:§ Negotiation; team development; managing conflict; effective meetings;facilitating team success; making decisions and solving problems creatively;power; coaching and feedback; leadership and empowerment.Note: You need to support all your reflections with research literature (only peer-reviewedjournal articles).Make sure that you only write about your specific experience in your team. This section needs todemonstrate your reflective capabilities of linking your team experience to the research literature.Part 3In this section, you should:• Reflect on the success or failure of the team processes• Suggest how the team processes might be improved using research literature (only peerreviewed journal articles).In this section, you should make recommendations supported by research literature aboutwhat can be done better in the future when working in teams. It should show both your reflectivecapabilities of assessing your team experience, but also offer ways to improve based on theresearch literature.ConclusionSummarise main points made in the reflection. Remember to re-reference the main points made in thebody of your reflective essay (Parts 1, 2 and 3).3ReferencesInclude your reference list in this section. You need to use APA v.6 referencing style for the intext references and reference list. A minimum of 6 peer reviewed journal articles (post 2007) isrequired.• Reference list needs to be correct and in alphabetical order by author surname.• In-text references are needed for all paraphrased material (direct quotes are not to beincluded).Remember to use the correct source (printed textbook, eBook, printed journal, digital journal etc.)submission point.4 ReflectiveEssayMarkingCriteria(35 marks)Excellent85% – 100%Very Good75% – 84%Good65% – 74%Satisfactory50% – 64%NeedsImprovement0% – 49%Introduction(2 marks)Clear outline ofwhat will bepresented in theessay.Excellentintroduction;providing a veryclear purposewhich ensures allareas relevant tothe topic areclearly outlined.Very goodintroduction;providing amostly clearlypurpose whichensures areasrelevant to thetopic are clearlyoutlined.Goodintroduction;addresses somepoints, lackssome detail;ensures someareas relevant tothe topic areoutlined.Satisfactoryintroduction;addresses limitedpoints of whichfew areas areoutlined.Very poor or nonexistentintroduction.Minimal areas, ifany at all, arerelevant to thetopic.Part 1(11 marks)Describes andanalyses theinterpersonaldynamics andintrapersonalissues thataffect the teamSupportsreflections withresearchliterature oninterpersonal,intrapersonaldynamics andteamcommunication.Excellentdescription andanalysis ofinterpersonaldynamics in theteam andintrapersonalissues.High quality andcomprehensivescholarlyresearch thatincludes morethan six peerreviewed journalspost 2007 thatsupport theanalysis.Very gooddescriptionand/or analysis ofinterpersonaldynamics in theteam andintrapersonalissues.Quality scholarlyresearch thatincludes morethan six peerreviewed journalspost 2007 thatsupport theanalysis.Good descriptionand/or analysis ofinterpersonaldynamics in theteam andintrapersonalissues.Good scholarlyresearch thatincludes at leastsix peer reviewedjournals post2007 that supportthe analysis.Satisfactorydescription and/oranalysis ofinterpersonaldynamics in theteam andintrapersonalissues.Satisfactoryscholarly researchthat includes sixpeer reviewedjournals post 2007that support theanalysis.Uncleardescription withlittle/no analysisof interpersonaldynamics in theteam andintrapersonalissues.Unsatisfactoryscholarlyresearch; is notpeer reviewedliterature/there isno literature used.Part 2(11 marks)Describes andanalyses theperformance ofyour teambased upon thephases of teamdevelopment(Tuckman,1965)Supportsreflections withresearchliterature onteamdevelopment.Excellentdescription andanalysis of teamprocesses/performance.High quality andcomprehensivescholarlyresearch thatincludes morethan six peerreviewed journalspost 2007 thatsupport theanalysis.Very gooddescription andanalysis of teamprocesses/performance.Quality scholarlyresearch thatincludes morethan six peerreviewed journalspost 2007 thatsupport theanalysis.Good descriptionand/or analysis ofteam processes/performance.Good scholarlyresearch thatincludes at leastsix peer reviewedjournals post2007 that supportthe analysis.Satisfactorydescription and/oranalysis of teamprocesses/performance.Satisfactoryscholarly researchthat includes sixpeer reviewedjournals post 2007that support theanalysis.Uncleardescription withlittle/no analysis.Unsatisfactoryscholarlyresearch; is notpeerreviewed/there isno literature used. 5 Part 3(6 marks)Reflection onthe success orfailure of theteam processes.Suggest howthe teamprocesses mightbe improvedusing researchliterature.Excellentreflections onsuccessand/failures ofthe team.Multiplerecommendationsmade based onhigh quality andcomprehensivescholarlyresearch thatincludes morethan six peerreviewed journalspost 2007 that areappropriate fortherecommendationsVery goodreflections onsuccessand/failures ofthe team.Some goodrecommendationsmade based onquality scholarlyresearch thatincludes morethan six peerreviewed journalspost 2007 that areappropriate fortherecommendationsGood reflectionson successand/failures ofthe team.Somerecommendationsmade based ongood scholarlyresearch thatincludes at leastsix peer reviewedjournals post2007 that areappropriate fortherecommendationsSatisfactoryreflections on thesuccessand/failures of theteam.Somerecommendationsmade based onsatisfactoryscholarly researchthat includes sixpeer reviewedjournal post 2007that areappropriate fortherecommendationsLimitedreflections on thesuccess and/failures of theteam.Limited/norecommendations.Unsatisfactoryscholarlyresearch; is notpeer reviewedliterature/there isno literature used.Conclusion(2 marks)A summary ofyour mainpoints from thebody (parts 1, 2& 3)The conclusionpresents adetailed andfocused summaryof the ideaspresented;drawing clear andwell-thought-outconclusions.The conclusionpresents a fairlydetailed andfocused summaryof the ideaspresented;drawing fairlyclear and wellthought-outconclusions.The conclusionpresents asomewhatdetailed andfocused summaryof the ideaspresented;providing someevidence ofconclusions.The conclusionprovides limiteddetail with noclear summary ofthe ideaspresented;drawing limitedconclusions.The conclusionfails to provideany clearevidence of theideas presented.Presentation /mechanics(3 marks)Complete andcorrectreference list(APA v.6)Paraphrasingand correct useof citations.Clear andaccurateEnglishexpression(spelling,grammar,syntax)Utilises current,appropriate andcredible sourceswhich stronglysupport thestudent’sreflectionsthroughout.Excellent Englishexpression; thereare no errors withspelling,grammar, syntax.Utilises mostlycurrent,appropriate andcredible sourceswhich mostlysupport thestudent’sreflectionsthroughout.Very goodEnglishexpression; thereare very minorerrors withspelling,grammar, syntax.Utilises somecurrent,appropriate andcredible sourceswhich at timessupport thestudent’sreflectionsthroughout.Good Englishexpression; thereare minor errorswith spelling,grammar, syntax.Utilises fewcurrent,appropriate andcredible sourceswhich providelimited support tothe student’sreflectionsthroughout.SatisfactoryEnglishexpression; thereare some errorswith spelling,grammar, syntax.Utilises little, ifany, current,appropriate andcredible sourceswhich providelittle, if any,support to thestudent’sreflectionsthroughout.Poor Englishexpression; needssignificantimprovement.There are severalerrors withspelling,grammar, syntax.