ACC00152 Business Finance

ACC00152 Business Finance
Assignment: Analysis and Memo to Management
Due: Wednesday 13 May, 11:00pm AEDT
You are working in the finance department of Innotech Ltd (INT). The Company has spent $3.4
million in research and development over the past 12 months developing battery technology which
will be incorporated into the Australian luxury car market. INT now need to choose between the
following three options for bringing the product to market. These options are:
Option 1: Manufacturing the product “in-house” and selling directly to the market
Option 2: Licensing another company to manufacture and sell the product in return for a royalty
Option 3: Sell the patent rights outright to the company mentioned in option 2
Your task
Your manager, INT’s CFO, Mr Barry Smith, has asked you to evaluate the three different options and
draft a memo to the Board of Directors providing recommendations on the alternatives, along with
supporting analyses.
Mr Smith has outlined the following three (3) areas you need to cover in your memo:
a) Analyse base case figures for the three options and using NPV as the investment decision
rule;
b) Provide recommendations based on the base-case analyses;
c) Provide recommendations on further analyses and discuss factors that should be considered
prior to making a final decision on the three options (Note. You do NOT have to undertake
any further financial analyses).
Further details for the various options are as follows:
Option 1: Manufacturing the product “in-house” and selling directly to the market
Three months ago, INT paid an external consultant $1.2 million for a production plan and demand
analysis. The consultant recommended producing and selling the product for five years only as
technological innovation will likely render the market too competitive to be profitable enough after
that time. Sales of the product are estimated as follows:
In the first year, it is estimated that the product will be sold for $40,000 per unit. However, the price
will drop in the following three years to $35,000 per unit and fall again to $33,000 per unit in the
final year of the project, reflecting the effects of anticipated competition and improving technology

Year Estimated sales volume
(units)
1 5,300
2 4,770
3 4,293
4 3,864
5 3,671

in the market. Variable production costs are estimated to be $27,300 per unit for the entire life of the
project.
Fixed production costs (excluding depreciation) are predicted to be $3.1 million per year and
marketing costs will be $1.5 million per year.
Production will take place in factory space the company owns and currently rents to another
business for $2 million per year. Equipment costing $90 million will have to be purchased. This
equipment will be depreciated for tax purposes using the prime cost method at a rate of 10% per
annum. At the end of the project, the company expects to be able to sell the equipment for $40
million.
Investment in net working capital will also be required. It is estimated that accounts receivable will
be 25% of sales, while inventory and accounts payable will each be 20% of variable and fixed
production costs (excluding depreciation). This investment is required from the beginning of the
project because credit sales, inventory stocks and purchases on trade credit will begin building up
immediately. All accounts receivable will be collected, suppliers paid and inventories sold by the end
of the project, thus the investment in net working capital will be returned at that point. (Refer to
example provided in Assessment Details).
Option 2: Licensing another company to manufacture and sell the product in return for a royalty
Lion Batteries Ltd (LIB), a multinational corporation, has expressed an interest in manufacturing and
marketing the product under license for 5 years. For each unit sold, LIB will pay $1,000 royalty fees
per unit to INT as part of its licensing agreement. Due to LIB’s international reach and strong
distribution networks, it is estimated that they can sell 5% more units each year than INT.
Option 3: Sell the patent rights outright to the company mentioned in option 2
As an alternative to a licensing arrangement, LIB has offered to buy the patent rights to the product
design from INT for $15 million. This amount would be paid in 4 (four) equal annual instalments, with
the first payable immediately.
General Information Relevant to the Analysis
INT’s cost of capital is 12% and the company is subject to a 30% tax rate. Assume that royalties and
patent right payments are treated as assessable income for tax purposes and that tax is paid at the
end of the year in which the income is received. The company is not eligible for any research and
development tax deductions. During the project analysis period(s), INT is expected to have other
sources of taxable income.
Marking Criteria
Your manager at INT has asked that you structure your memo to begin with a (maximum) one-page
summary of your method, key findings and recommendations, supported by no more than three
additional pages showing input assumptions, estimated cash flows and supplementary analysis detail
and discussion.
Table format for presenting numerical analyses is preferable. Ensure that readers will be able to
easily follow what you have done. You may wish to use footnotes under tables that clarify
calculations, details and/or assumptions where this is not clear from the table itself.
This assignment has a 30% weighting in your overall mark for this unit. It will be marked out of 30.
Marks will be allocated as per rubric on following page based on:
 Accurate analysis of base case figures (18 marks)
 Sound recommendations on the alternatives founded on base case analyses (1.5 mark)
 Insightful recommendations for further considerations prior to final decision (7.5 marks)
 Memo format and professionalism of communication (3 marks).

MARKING CRITERIA Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
Accurate analysis of base case
figures for Option 1 (13.5 marks)
You have selected and used all the correct
variables for the base case analysis and
calculated all the incremental free cash
flows and the correct NPV for Option 1
(13.5 marks)
You have selected and used all the correct
variables for the base case analysis and
calculated most of the incremental free
cash flows. You have used the correct
method to calculate the NPV for Option 1
(10-13 marks)
You have selected and used most of the
correct variables for the base case
analysis and calculated some of the
incremental free cash flows. You have
used the correct method to calculate the
NPV for Option 1 (7-9.5 marks)
You have selected and used some of the
correct variables for the base case
analysis and calculated a few of the
incremental free cash flows. You have
used the correct method to calculate the
NPV for Option 1 (3.5-6.5 marks)
None or very few of the correct variables
have been used for the base case analysis
and calculated none or hardly any of the
incremental free cash flows and the
correct NPV for Option 1 (0-3 marks)
Accurate analysis of base case
figures for Option 2 (3 marks)
You have selected and used all the correct
variables for the base case analysis and
calculated all the incremental free cash
flows and the correct NPV for Option 2 (3
marks)
You have selected and used all the correct
variables for the base case analysis and
calculated most of the incremental free
cash flows. You have used the correct
method to calculate the NPV for Option 2
(2-2.5 marks)
You have selected and used most of the
correct variables for the base case
analysis and calculated some of the
incremental free cash flows. You have
used the correct method to calculate the
NPV for Option 2 (1-1.5 mark)
You have selected and used some of the
correct variables for the base case
analysis and calculated a few of the
incremental free cash flows. You have
used the correct method to calculate the
NPV for Option 2 (0.5 mark)
None or very few of the correct variables
have been used for the base case analysis
and calculated none or hardly any of the
incremental free cash flows and the
correct NPV for Option 2 (0 mark)
Accurate analysis of base case
figures for Option 3 (1.5 marks)
You have selected and used all the correct
variables for the base case analysis and
calculated all the incremental free cash
flows and the correct NPV for Option 3 (1.5
marks).
You have selected and used all the correct
variables for the base case analysis and
calculated most of the incremental free
cash flows. You have used the correct
method to calculate the NPV for Option 3
(1 mark)
You have selected and used most of the
correct variables for the base case
analysis and calculated some of the
incremental free cash flows. You have
used the correct method to calculate the
NPV for Option 3 (0.75 mark)
You have selected and used some of the
correct variables for the base case
analysis and calculated a few of the
incremental free cash flows. You have
used the correct method to calculate the
NPV for Option 3 (0.5 mark)
None or very few of the correct variables
have been used for the base case analysis
and calculated none or hardly any of the
incremental free cash flows and the
correct NPV for Option 3 (0 mark)
Sound recommendations on the
alternatives founded on base case
analyses (1.5 mark)
You have made a recommendation for A, B
or C applying the NPV investment decision
rule (1.5 mark).
You have made a recommendation for A, B
or C applying the NPV investment decision
rule (1 mark).
You have made an attempt to make a
recommendation for A, B or C applying the
NPV investment decision rule (0.75 mark).
You have made an attempt to make a
recommendation for A, B or C applying the
NPV investment decision rule (0.5 mark).
No recommendations made (0 mark).
Insightful recommendations for
further considerations prior to
final decision (7.5 marks)
Using results from your quantitative
analysis of the data, your
recommendations are insightful and
demonstrate a critical application of
techniques used in the capital budgeting
process (7.5 marks).
Using results from your quantitative
analysis of the data, your
recommendations are considered and
demonstrate a reasoned application of
techniques used in the capital budgeting
process (6 marks).
Using results from your quantitative
analysis of the data, your
recommendations are sound and
demonstrate application of techniques
used in the capital budgeting process (4.5
marks).
You have made a cursory attempt to
recommendation further analysis (1.5-3
marks).
Very weak or no recommendations made
(0-1 mark).
Memo format and professionalism
of communication (3 marks)
Memo contains all of the required
elements and formatting. Rules of
grammar & punctuation are followed, no
spelling errors or jargon, easily understood
by a lay person (3 marks).
Memo contains most of the required
elements and formatting. Rules of
grammar & punctuation are followed, few
spelling errors or jargon, easily understood
by a lay person (2-2.5 marks).
Memo contains some of the required
elements and formatting. Rules of
grammar & punctuation are generally
followed, several spelling errors or jargon,
the key points of the memo are not clearly
stated (1.5 mark).
Memo contains some of the required
elements and formatting. Rules of
grammar & punctuation are generally
followed, several spelling errors or jargon,
the key points of the memo are not clearly
stated (0.5-1 marks).
Memo contains none or very few of the
required elements and formatting and
contains numerous grammatical,
punctuation & spelling errors. Lots of
jargon & unexplained acronyms (0 marks).
Marking Rubric for ACC00152 S1 2020 Assignment